Sign up for our free webinar on May 3, 2018, “Q: Is There Really a Skills and Experience Gap Causing Failures in Today’s Construction Marketplace? A: No. Learn how recent hotel mold and moisture failures tell us what the real issues are.”
The emergence of modular construction as an option for new construction is becoming mainstream. While the reasons why have been reported on extensively, what has not been reported is that the modular construction industry has been plagued by mold and moisture problems, especially on projects located in warm and humid climates like the Southeast U.S. Both wood-frame and steel-frame modular construction units have experienced condensation problems in crawl spaces, within marriage walls, and within ceiling-to-floor cavities that have not only resulted in deterioration of the wood and corrosion of metal floor pans, but have also led to damaged wallboard and mold issues.
The greatest risk of modular construction failure has been seen in facilities that are domicidal or multi-family in nature, such as hotels, student housing, senior living, and soldier housing. The living units of these types of facilities have inherent similarities: they require both an individual cooling/heating unit, bathroom exhaust, and some sort of central HVAC make-up air system. In addition, these kinds of buildings contain many more modular “boxes,” increasing the number of marriage wall interior cavities and ceiling-to-floor cavities that might not be required in other types of modular construction.
The nature of modular construction makes it difficult to repair once water or mold damage is found. Sometimes the damage can be such that the modular building has to be deconstructed to remove deteriorated materials, and then re-designed and re-constructed using conventional methods. This essentially causes the advantages of modular construction to dissolve away as the building gets converted to a traditional “stick” wood-frame building or a traditional steel structure building.
Those who wish to avoid mold and moisture problems in modular building design and construction should realize that it’s a perfect candidate for an outside peer review, especially in warm and humid climates.
- Inherently, the design and construction of modular buildings require careful interfacing between the various designers and contractors. There can often be a set of base building designers and contractors and then a different team for the modular units themselves.
- Achieving the correct building pressurization between the base building design and the modular unit design is an area where a peer reviewer can help the team tremendously in identifying how the modular box HVAC design will work with the base building HVAC design in order to achieve the correct building pressurization.
Here are five key reasons that modular building failures are occurring:
1) Modular construction inherently contains hidden interior spaces that make it difficult to control infiltration of outdoor air.This includes the cavity between modular boxes found in wood-frame modular construction, as well as spaces between modules found in the steel-frame modular construction. These interior cavities provide an easy pathway for airflow to not only enter the building but also to travel long distances through the building. As this air travels throughout the building, it washes over interior surfaces, causing direct condensation or at least raised surfaces – conditions that have been found to cause physical damage and mold growth on wood framing and interior drywall.
Figure 1 shows a steel-framed modular hotel in Florida on which Liberty Building Forensics Group (LBFG) performed work. It first began to experience metal floor pan corrosion from the underside of the guest rooms because warm and humid air was traveling through this cavity with ease, resulting in condensation on the metal pan. This problem occurred on each floor of the building, not just on the bottom level. The building make-up air system was unable to fully or correctly pressurize the building because the interstitial spaces between the modular “boxes” were too leaky.
Also shown in this picture is the mold damage that occurred on the demising walls between the guest rooms, at the marriage between the modular boxes. The damage on the drywall between the interstitial spaces had to be removed and the wall was then re-designed and re-built using a conventional structural design. This converted the modular structure to a more traditional structure.
2) Each modular box as it comes from the manufacturer is designed and constructed in a vacuum of the requirements for the overall performance of the building.One area that experiences serious repercussions from this fact is the HVAC system design and installation that dictates the building pressurization. The modular box that comes from the factory generally contains both the cooling and heating unit and the exhaust for a bathroom, both of which are dependent upon the separate common area HVAC system for make-up air. It does not seem to be a common consideration during the design and construction of modular facilities that the pressurization of the overall building is dependent upon the pressure characteristic of each interior space, whether occupied space or space between two modular boxes. Similarly, the air leakage characteristics of modular-constructed buildings are dependent not only upon the leakage rate of the modular box itself, but also upon the leakiness between and around the compartments that make up the building.
Figure 3 shows the cavity that exists between the modular units. In the case of this building, the cavity was interrupted from the ground floor to the roof. This allowed a free flow of air to move not only throughout the building but more importantly inside these cavities, resulting in both the deterioration of the drywall and mold growth.
3) Modular design and construction often uses a crawl space, which adversely impacts the ability to control condensation and outdoor air flowing in and throughout the building. The crawl space can be difficult to isolate from the building cavities (including the marriage wall cavities), allowing air to flow more freely through the building. Many times the crawl space is designed by the base designer rather than the modular manufacturer, resulting in the improper design and construction of the crawl spaces for use within a modular building. In warm and humid climates, this fact has caused problems with moisture accumulation and condensation occurring not only on the belly wrap of the modular boxes, but also inside the marriage wall cavities.
The photographs in Figure 4 show the marriage wall between two modular boxes in an assisted living facility in Florida. Often these cavities remain open (or at least poorly sealed), allowing for outdoor conditions to reach in and affect them. In Figure 3, moisture accumulation and condensation occurred not only on the belly wrap (see Video 1) but also on the wood found in the marriage wall cavity (see Video 2). This cavity between modular boxes is a unique condition found only within modular construction, It is a key area that must be addressed if moisture accumulation is going to be prevented in future modular construction in warm and humid climates.
Video 1:Moisture Accumulation on Belly Wrap
Video 2:Moisture Accumulation in the Marriage Wall Cavity
4) There is a modular box versus base building conflict inherently built into how modular buildings are designed, built, and delivered.The modular boxes are designed and manufactured in a vacuum of the design and construction of the base building. The crawlspace, roof, attic, exterior cladding, and HVAC system are more often than not each designed by separate entities, and are then constructed by entirely different entities. As a result, the typical “design-by-silo” challenges inherently found within the design and construction process are accentuated to an even greater extent than they would normally be. There are now essentially at least two architects, two mechanical engineers, and two contractors on the team making decisions apart from each other about building pressurization, air barrier design, and dehumidification capacity. For this reason, many modular facilities do not end up with continuous barriers or proper building pressurization needed in a warm and humid climate to prevent moisture-related mold problems.
Figure 5 shows the bottom of the third floor “pan”. This area was found to have condensation occurring as a result of air flow through the third floor pan and the second floor ceiling. The areas that had direct air flow from the room PTAC units were worse because they were found to be the coldest. In some cases, the surface temperatures were found to be as low as 68F during the summer months.
5) Inspections for code compliance often differ depending on the jurisdiction in which the individual parts are either manufactured or constructed.For example, in the State of Florida, modular construction is governed by the Department of Community Affairs. The DCA inspects each modular box before it leaves the manufacturing facility. On the other hand, the base building is inspected by the local code official. This individual does not, however, inspect the modular box once it has received the DCA inspection and certification. While both governmental agencies rely upon the same building codes, this “silo inspection” competes with a more holistic process that has overall building performance as the overarching goal – and is found wanting.
About the Authors
LBFG President George DuBose, with over 25 years’ experience in building failures and a focus on mold and moisture issues as well as HVAC and building envelope failures, is co-author of three manuals on IAQ and Mold Prevention, which have been used on over $4B in construction.
Don Snell, a Senior Forensic Engineer/Vice President at LBFG with over 25 years’ experience in all aspects of HVAC systems, has used diagnostic and remedial solutions to help some of the largest commercial builders in the world with catastrophic moisture and mold intrusion resulting from HVAC failure.
Rick Scott, a Senior Forensic Architect and building envelope expert at LBFG with more than 35 years’ architectural experience, has conducted more than 500 forensic investigations and has helped solve some of the most complicated mold and moisture failures in the world.
Chuck Allen, a Forensic Architect at LBFG withexpertise in building envelopes and roofing and wall systems, has applied his expert architectural knowledge and cutting-edge technological skills on some of the largest and most complicated building failure projects in the world.
LBFG has provided mold and moisture diagnoses and solutions for buildings to owners, contractors, and developers worldwide. The firm has project experience in the U.S., Canada, Mexico, the Caribbean, Central America, the Middle East, Southeast Asia, and Europe. Contact us at email@example.com or by phone at 407/467-5518.